"Hannibal" at a desert airstrip

Maintenance
 

How well were the HP42's maintained?(13) Much of the attitude toward maintenance seems to have been as much by experience as by schedule. These were still early days in aviation and the type of rigid maintenance schedules imposed by experience and accident investigation were still to come. Metal fatigue as applied to airframes- a young science. This has been suggested by other documents in the PRO.(13)
PRO records covering maintenance and the accident investigation suggest some straight forward explanations for the loss of Hannibal

1. AVIA5/13 (section 18) -   Describes a crash the Hannibal had early on in its life. A single engine failed followed by the failure of one of the other engines. The aircraft made a forced landing in a field. Most of the damage to the Hannibal was sustained when it hit obstacles in the field. None of the passengers or crew were hurt.
Added 02/2018
 An event in Palestine in November 1932 adds to airframe stress considerations. Here.

2. AVIA2/892 - Maintenance records from Heliopolis where the HP42 eastern types were based. This contains a memo concerning the maintenance schedules of the HP42 aircraft (Dated 19/9/35). It makes 2 main points:
        a) Due to the age (5 yrs?) of the HP42 aircraft either they need a total strip down or their routine maintenance schedules need to be carried out more thoroughly.
        b) Imperial Airways will only do the absolute minimum to keep the aircraft in the air (and gives an example).
        Note. “Captain Townsend and the other HP42 pilots were increasingly concerned about the age and vibrations on the HP42 fleet.” (57)
 
3. AVIA 2/2311 - The accident report concludes the most likely reason for the loss was multiple engine failure causing the aeroplane to descend into the sea shortly after the last transmission. The last transmission broke up due to the trailing antenna wire touching the surface of the sea. The report goes into great detail describing the possible mechanical failures but suggests the failure of one engine could lead to one or more of the others failing due to increased stress. The Hannibal could fly on 3 engines but would be forced to slowly descend on 2 engines. (Note: an HP42 made the trip from Croydon to Paris on 3 engines to demonstrate the reliability of the aircraft.)
 
 This last point is very dependant on the actual flying altitude reported/recorded in the radio log. It seems improbable that 100 ft is a sensible altitude for a proposed over water flight. It gives no margin for error should even one engine fail. Radio aerials trailing behind risk touching the water or any vessels encountered enroute. Although the Dibba- Sharjah pass through the mountains is comparatively low in altitude, it would require a climb from 100ft. 1000ft allows a greater safety margin. (The Hajar Mountains rise to 6800 feet. to the north of this route.) This would discount the accident investigation report's theory on the failing last transmission, unless only the last transmission of a series was recorded. An overloaded airframe may have been stressed to failure and subject to declining lift as the days temperature increased.

AVIA 2 /2311 – It seen in the official report that, “As a result of pilot's remarks of poor performance the aircraft” (G-AAGX) “ was taken off service” on 10.7.39 – “AND REMAINED IN STORE AT ALEXANDRIA UNTIL 17.10.39.” Was demand for airframes such that it was reinstated to service? However, “various and continuous problems “ were “reported including engine failure , vibration and poor climb rate.” Also noted was, “Airscrews changed on 4.12.39”, followed by “Further continuous complaints of vibration and fuel flow problems”. Maintenance concessions were extensive. One of these covering numerous flying surface and control components expired or was issued at 11.30a.m. on 2.3.40 whilst the aircraft was expected to be enroute to Alexandria. A concession was made in extending one of G-AAGX’s engines running hours from 600 to 625 hours on 25.2.40 (
13a) What engines and airscrews were installed on G-AAGX when returned to service? The Jupiter XI F serial numbers installed are in the official report. Some of these questions might be answered by the rumoured existence of a photograph taken at Jiwani on the day of the last flight.
 
  Compare the propeller installation on the Science Museum model with the illustration of 'Hannibal' at Khartoum. (above)  Wooden two part propellers were capable of transport as spares inside the aircraft. 
  'The Air Ministry insisted on the two-piece airscrews on the basis that the 4-bladers were too troublesome to store and transport overseas. (It's not clear that they actually stored spares aboard)." (45)
  Is there any evidence that another type of  metal propeller was installed on March 1st, 1940?
Photo copyright RHobby 2007  Bristol Jupiter XI at Science Museum

Next | Home | Previous | Links |

Richard Hobby, 2002 - 8. ( This page is a collation of information from various sources, please address any concerns about source and accreditation to page author )